Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Amir, T (1986) Transient Response Analysis of a Dual Cycle System. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 403–10.

Arditi, D and Albulak, M Z (1986) Line‐of‐Balance Scheduling in Pavement Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 411–24.

Bresnen, M J, Bryman, A E, Ford, J R, Beardsworth, A D and Keil, T E (1986) Leader Orientation of Construction Site Managers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 370–86.

Handa, V K and Barcia, R M (1986) Linear Scheduling Using Optimal Control Theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 387–93.

Herbsman, Z (1986) SERC—A Model for Estimating Construction Inputs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 425–39.

Kagan, H A, Leary, D J and Pratter, G E K (1986) Design Engineers' Responsibilities During Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 394–402.

Karaa, F A and Nasr, A Y (1986) Resource Management in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 346–57.

Thomas, H R and Bluedorn, A C (1986) Case Study of Organizational Changes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 358–69.

W. L., S, Rybel, V W and Cochran, L (1986) Dewatering for Opal Springs Powerhouse Excavation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 440–51.

William C., I (1986) Future Directions for Computerized Construction Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 326–45.

Wong, T K and Logcher, R D (1986) Contractors in Cyclical Economic Environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(03), 310–25.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Business management; Productivity; Construction companies;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:3(310)
  • Abstract:
    This study investigated how the performance of construction firms during different extremes in the business cycle was impacted by a variety of the firms' characteristics. A performance index for a firm's relative market performance was devised and used with a step‐wise regression technique to model the relationships between operational variables and the performance index. Ten interviews wifh senior construction executives were conducted to guide the development of the model. The results show that a firm's relative market performance can be influenced by: Efforts in planning and control; control at firm level; effectiveness of project planning and control; efforts in marketing; effectiveness of marketing; subcontracting; long‐range planning; safety; geographic diversification; technological competence; and union/open‐shop construction. Significance varied with cycle point and size. Recommendations are made on how to improve a contractor's performance in cyclical business environments.